Ravenbrook / Projects / Perforce Defect Tracking Integration / Version 2.4 Product Sources / Design
Perforce Defect Tracking Integration Project
This document describes a Python extension that provides an interface to the TeamTrack API. It follows the design document procedure [RB 2000-10-05] and the design document structure [RB 2000-08-30].
This document is obsolete. The P4DTI no longer supports integration with TeamTrack. This document is retained for reference purposes, but will not be maintained.
The purpose of this document was to make it possible for people to maintain the extension, and to use the Python interface.
This document will not be modified as the product is developed.
The readership of this document is the product developers.
This document is not confidential.
The Python interface to TeamTrack is designed to work in all the supported configurations.
There are four dimensions to consider in a TeamTrack configuration:
The TeamTrack server version and build number. We support release 4.5 (various builds), 5.0 (build 5034), and 5.5 (build 55012). We also work with release 5.02 (build 50207), but do not support it.
The TeamTrack API version. We support versions 2 and 3.
The TeamTrack database schema. We support all TeamTrack database schemas from version 21.
Whether the TeamTrack database was created in TeamTrack prior
to 5.0, with a TS_CASES
table, or in TeamTrack 5.0 or
later, with a TTT_ISSUES
table.
Table 1 sets out the compatibility between TeamTrack API versions and TeamTrack releases, as far as we know. "T" in the table means that we have tested that the combination works. "Y" means that we believe the combination works. "N" means that we know the combination does not work. "?" means we don't know.
Table 1. TeamTrack API compatibility
API revision | TeamTrack version | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.5 | 5.0 | 5.01 | 5.02 | 5.5 | |
2.1 | T | N | N | N | N |
3.1 | N | T | Y1 | Y1 | Y1 |
3.3 | N | T | Y | T | T |
3.5 | N | N2 | N2 | N2 | T |
Notes:
TeamShare plan to move all customers to TeamTrack 5.5 by 2002-05-31. So after that point we may be able to drop support for older TeamTrack server versions and older TeamTrack API revisions. See [Shaw 2001-12-19].
To support both TeamTrack 4.5 and TeamTrack 5.*, we build two versions of the Python interface to TeamTrack:
teamtrack45.pyd
is the interface to TeamTrack 4.5
servers. teamtrack50.pyd
is the interface to TeamTrack 5.*
servers. The module teamtrack.py
calls either from teamtrack45 import *
or from
teamtrack50 import *
according to the value of the teamtrack_version
configuration parameter. That way, the P4DTI can just
import teamtrack
as before.
Note that there's no way to determine a TeamTrack server version through the API. If you have an incompatible API revision, then you may not be able to connect at all. See [Shaw 2001-07-02] and job000458.
In TeamTrack 4.5 (and TeamTrack 5.* with a database upgraded from
TeamTrack 4.5) the cases table is called TS_CASES
and its
table number is 1. In TeamTrack 5.0, the cases table is called
TTT_ISSUES
and its table number is 1000. This can't be
determined by reference to the API version or by the database version
(since these are the same in TeamTrack 5.0 whether the database was
upgraded from TeamTrack 4.5 or not). Instead, one must check to see if
the TS_TABLES
table has a record with TS_ID =
1
(if so, that table is the cases table), or if there is no so
record, run the query SELECT * FROM TS_TABLES WHERE TS_SNAME LIKE
'Issue'
and take the TS_ID
and
TS_DBNAME
fields of the record returned. This is the
method suggested by TeamShare in [Shaw
2001-06-27] and [Shaw
2001-06-28].
This interface supports these configurations portably using server
methods case_table_id
and case_table_name
.
The interface defines one module, teamtrack
(use
import teamtrack
). There are two classes, representing TeamTrack
servers and records from the TeamTrack database. These classes don't have
names in Python: the only way to make a server object is to connect to a
server using teamtrack.connect
, and the only way to make
record objects (at present) is to query the server.
Some features are not supported by every version of the TeamTrack
API. The teamtrack
module indicates which features it
supports using the feature
dictionary.
Errors are always indicated by throwing a Python exception: teamtrack.error
for errors in the
interface; or teamtrack.tsapi_error
for
errors in the TeamTrack API. The interface never indicates errors by
returning an exceptional value from a function. Exceptions of both types
are associated with a message. For example:
try:
# do teamtrack stuff
except teamtrack.error, message:
print 'teamtrack interface error: ', message
except teamtrack.tsapi_error, message:
print 'TeamTrack API error: ', message
The teamtrack
module can throw other exceptions than
teamtrack.error
and teamtrack.tsapi_error
,
notably KeyError
(when a field name is not found in a
record).
Connect to a TeamTrack server on hostname (use the format
"host:8080
" to specify a non-default port number) with the
specified userid and password. If successful, return a server object
representing the connection. For example:
import socket
server = teamtrack.connect('joe', '', socket.gethostname())
teamtrack.error
is the Python error object for errors
that occur in the teamtrack module.
A dictionary that maps the name of a feature to 1 if the feature is
supported. (So you can test if the Python interface to TeamTrack
supports feature foo
by evaluating
teamtrack.feature.get('foo')
.) The following feature names
are defined:
submit
submit
method. A dictionary that maps the name of a table in the TeamTrack database
(minus the initial TS_
) to its table identifier (a small
integer). For example
teamtrack.table['CASES']
is the table identifier for the TS_CASES
table.
A dictionary that maps the name of a TeamTrack field type to its identifier (a small integer). For example
teamtrack.field_type['TEXT']
is the field type for a text field.
teamtrack.tsapi_error
is the Python error object for errors
that occur in the TeamTrack API.
Returns the table id of the table containing the cases (this is table 1 in databases created in TeamTrack 4.5 and 1000 in databases created in TeamTrack 5.0).
Returns the name of the table containing the cases (this is
TS_CASES
in databases created in TeamTrack 4.5 and
TTT_ISSUES
in databases created in TeamTrack 5.0).
Delete the record with the specified identifier from the specified
table (which must be one of the table identifiers specified in
teamtrack.table
).
Returns a new record object. The record has the fields in the schema
for the specified table (which must be one of the table identifiers
specified in teamtrack.table
), and is suitable for
adding or submitting to that table.
Execute an SQL query on the specified table (which must be one of the
table identifiers specified in teamtrack.table
) of the
form
SELECT * FROM table
(if where_clause
is the empty string), or
SELECT * FROM table WHERE where_clause
(otherwise). Return the records matching the query as a list of record objects.
Remember to use the right field names in the where clause: the
returned record may contain a field called foo
, but the
database field is probably TS_FOO
. See [TeamShare
2000-01-20] for details of the TeamTrack database.
Read the record from the specified table (which must be one of the
table identifiers specified in teamtrack.table
) with the specified
record identifier. If successful, return a record object representing
the record. For example, the call
record = server.read_record(teamtrack.table['CASES'], 17)
is roughly equivalent to the SQL query
SELECT * FROM TS_CASES WHERE TS_ID = 17
Return a list of states which are available to cases in the given
workflow. If the include_parent
argument is 1, then the
list includes states inherited from the parent workflow.
The returned list is a list of record objects from the
TS_STATES
table.
Return a list of states which are available to cases in the given project.
The returned list is a list of record objects from the
TS_TRANSITIONS
table.
Records present (part of) the Python dictionary interface. To look up a field in a record object, index the record object with the field name. For example:
# Get the title of case 17
record = server.read_record(teamtrack.table['CASES'], 17)
title = record['TITLE']
To update a field in a record object, assign to the index expression.
For example, record['TITLE'] = 'Foo'
.
As for ordinary Python dictionaries, the has_key
method determines if a field is present in the record, and the
keys
method returns a list of names of fields in the
record.
Add the record to its table in the TeamTrack database. Update the record object so that it matches the new record in the table. Return the record object.
Add a field to the database schema, by adding a record to the
TS_FIELDS
table and using the information in that record to
add the field to the appropriate table. Fields can only be added to the
following tables: Cases, Incidents, Companies, Contacts, Merchandise,
Products, Problems, Resolutions, and Service Agreements.
The record object must be in the right format for adding to the
TS_FIELDS
table. Its TABLEID
field is used to
determine which table the field should be added to, and its
FLDTYPE
field is used to determine the type of the added
field (it should be one of the vaues in the teamtrack.field_type
dictionary.
For example, to add a field to the TS_CASES
table:
f = server.new_record(teamtrack.table['FIELDS']
f['TABLEID'] = teamtrack.table['CASES']
f['NAME'] = 'Cost to fix (in euros)'
f['DBNAME'] = 'COST'
f['FLDTYPE'] = teamtrack.field_type['NUMERIC']
f.add_field()
See [TeamShare
2000-01-20] for details of the fields in the TS_FIELDS
table and what they mean.
This method is supported if and only if the submit feature is supported.
Submit a new record into the workflow. The login_id
argument must be a string containing the user name of the user on whose
behalf the record is being submitted (this must correspond to the
TS_LOGINID
field for a record in the TS_USERS
table).
The remaining arguments are optional. The project_id
argument is the project the record should belong to; if it is not
supplied then it is taken to be the TS_PROJECTID
field in
the submitted record. The folder_id
argument corresponds
to the nFolderId
argument to the
TSServer::Submit
method. I don't know what it means. It
defaults to zero if not supplied.
Returns the record identifier of the submitted record.
For example, this fragment of code takes a copy of case 1 and submits it as a new case on behalf of user Joe:
# Make a copy of case 1
old_id = 1
new = server.new_record(teamtrack.table['CASES'])
old = server.read_record(teamtrack.table['CASES'], old_id)
fields_to_copy = ['TITLE', 'DESCRIPTION', 'ISSUETYPE', 'PROJECTID', 'STATE', 'ACTIVEINACTIVE', 'PRIORITY', 'SEVERITY']:
for f in fields_to_copy:
new[f] = old[f]
# Submit the copy.
new_id = new.submit('Joe')
Return the table identifier of the table in the TeamTrack database to
which this record corresponds. (For record retrieved from the TeamTrack
database this is the table they came from; for records created using the
server's new_record
method, this is the table whose schema the record matches.)
Transition a record in the workflow. In version 1.2 of the API,
only records in the TS_CASES
and TS_INCIDENTS
tables can be transitioned. The login_id
argument must be
a string containing the user name of the user on whose behalf the
transition is being made (this must correspond to the
TS_LOGINID
field for a record in the TS_USERS
table). The transition
argument is an integer identifying
the transition to be carried out. It must be the TS_ID
field of a record in the TS_TRANSITIONS
table.
The project_id
argument is the project the record should
belong to after the transition; if it is not supplied then it is taken
to be the TS_PROJECTID
field in the record.
It is not straightforward to pick a transition that apply to a case if you don't know the transition's number. Transitions are local to workflows (and so there may be several transitions with a given name), but workflows form a hierarchy and inherit transitions from their parent.
The algorithm shown below constructs a map from workflow id and transition name to the transition record corresponding to that name in that workflow, and a map from project id to workflow id.
# Get all the transitions and workflows from the TeamTrack database.
transitions = server.query(teamtrack.table['TRANSITIONS'], '')
workflows = server.query(teamtrack.table['WORKFLOWS'], '1=1 ORDER BY TS_SEQUENCE')
# transition_map is a map from workflow id and transition name to
# the transition corresponding to that name in that workflow.
transition_map = {}
for t in transitions:
# This is really a workflow id, not a project id (see the TeamTrack
# schema documentation).
w = t['PROJECTID']
if not transition_map.has_key(w):
transition_map[w] = {}
if not transition_map[w].has_key(t['NAME']):
transition_map[w][t['NAME']] = t
# Now go through all the workflows and add transitions they inherit from
# their parent workflow. This works because we've used the TS_SEQUENCE
# field to put the workflows in pre-order, so that all of a workflow's
# ancestors is considered before the workflow itself is considered.
for w in workflows:
if not transition_map.has_key(w['ID']):
transition_map[w['ID']] = {}
if w['PARENTID']:
for name, transition in transition_map[w['PARENTID']].items():
if not transition_map[w['ID']].has_key(name):
transition_map[w['ID']][name] = transition
# project_workflow is a map from project id to workflow id.
projects = server.query(teamtrack.table['PROJECTS'], '')
project_workflow = {}
for p in projects:
project_workflow[p['ID']] = p['WORKFLOWID']
With these maps, we can apply the "Resolve" transition to case 12 on behalf of user Newton:
case = server.read_record(teamtrack.table['CASES'], 12)
transition = transition_map[project_workflow[case['PROJECTID']]]['Resolve']
case.transition('newton', transition['ID'])
Update the record in the TeamTrack database that corresponds to this
record object. Update the record object so that it matches the updated
record in the table. Return the record object. If unsuccessful, raise
a teamtrack.error
exception.
For example, to add some text to the description of case 2:
case = server.read_record(teamtrack.table['CASES'], 2)
case['DESCRIPTION'] = case['DESCRIPTION'] + '\nAdditional text.'
case.update()
Python extension modules are described in [Lutz 1996, 14]. Additional details with respect to building Python extensions using Visual C++ on Windows are given in [Hammond 2000, 22].
The TeamTrack API is described in [TeamShare 2001-12-12].
I have only built the extension under Windows NT and Windows 2000 using Microsoft Visual C++. I believe it should build and run anywhere that Python and the TeamTrack API run.
TeamShare provide two versions of their library:
tsapi.lib
and TSApiWin32.dll
. I can build
extensions using the former but not using the latter. I guess that the
former is suitable for console applications and that latter for MFC
applications.
There are two places where I have used Windows-specific code (in both
cases the code is protected by #if defined(WIN32)
... #endif
):
Sockets on Windows need to be initialized. The TeamTrack API
provides the function TSInitializeWinsock
to do this. I
call this from initteamtrack
in
teamtrackmodule.cpp
.
Functions that are exported from a DLL need either to have the
declarator __declspec(dllexport)
or to be mentioned in a
/DLLEXPORT:foo
compiler option. We use the former method,
defining the macro TEAMTRACK_EXPORTED
for this purpose.
The only exported function is initteamtrack
in
teamtrackmodule.cpp
.
In the Developer Studio project for the Python interface to TeamTrack, there are three configurations. The "Release" configuration is normal. The "Debug" configuration builds a debugging interface but links with the non-debugging Python libraries. The "Python Debug" configuration builds a debugging interface and links with the debugging Python libraries. To use the third configuration you have to build a debugging version of Python (the binary distribution doesn't come with one).
Note that Python extensions have to be linked with the same Python library that the Python interpreter and all other extensions are linked with. So you can't build one extension with the debugging Python libraries and expect it to work with other extensions linked with the release Python libraries. This is explained in [Hammond 2000, 22].
Reference count management is briefly introduced in [Lutz 1996, page 585], but there's a much better account in [van Rossum 1999-04-13, 1.10].
I've commented each use of Py_DECREF
with one of:
the new owner of the object;
the location in the code of the corresponding
Py_INCREF
if I am decrementing a reference count I
incremented; or
"Delete" if the intention is to delete the object.
Where a Py_DECREF
would be expected (because the object
has been passed to a new owner) but is not needed because the new owner
does not increment the reference count, I have added a note to say so.
This applies to objects passed to PyList_SetItem
and
PyTuple_SetItem
(I guess that these functions are optimized
for the case where a newly-created object is added to the structure).
See [van
Rossum 1999-04-13, 1.10.2].
Python objects returned from functions need to have an extra reference count since they will be immediately put onto Python's stack without their reference count being incremented. Returning newly-created objects is safe, since they are always created with a reference count of 1. Other returned objects need to have their reference counts incremented.
The TeamTrack API is very memory-hungry: a record from the
TS_CASES
table can take more than 600kb to represent in
memory in the API client [Shaw
2001-04-16].
The TeamTrack API makes no attempt to check that memory allocation succeeds [GDR 2000-09-11, 2.2.2].
These two defects mean that running out of memory is commonplace and that this won't be detected, leading quickly to memory corruption and crashing.
TeamShare recommend two approaches to work around these defects:
Don't select very many records at a time. This is proposed in [Shaw 2001-04-16] and analyzed in [GDR 2001-05-16]. This can be implemented in Python, so isn't considered any further here.
To install a C++ memory exception handler and catch out of
memory exceptions in the client code [Schreiber
2001-04-09] (this won't actually catch all memory allocation errors,
since the TeamTrack API uses a mixture of C memory allocation
(malloc
and free
) and C++ memory allocation
(new
and delete
); the memory exception handler
won't catch failed calls to malloc
). An example of the
second approach is given in [TeamShare
2001-04-09].
I tried out this approach, and discovered the following:
You can't add a memory exception handler when writing a Python extension library: Python installs its own memory exception handler and complains if you try to install your own.
Python's memory exception handler catches memory allocation
failures in the TeamTrack API and reports them as
MemoryError
exceptions.
In our recommended configuration, where the P4DTI runs on the
same machine as the TeamTrack server, it's the server that fails when
memory is low, not the client (eventually a client call to
recv
on the socket blocks and eventually this times out).
So maybe our advice is poor? See job000321.
[GDR 2000-09-11] | "TeamTrack API comments"; Gareth Rees; Ravenbrook Limited; 2000-09-11. |
[GDR 2001-05-16] | "Performance analysis of TeamTrack API workarounds"; Gareth Rees; Ravenbrook Limited; 2001-05-16. |
[Hammond 2000] | "Python Programming on Win32"; Mark Hammond and Andy Robinson; OReilly; 2000-01; ISBN 1-56592-621-8. |
[Lutz 1996] | "Programming Python"; Mark Lutz; O'Reilly; 1996-10; ISBN 1-56592-197-6. |
[RB 2000-08-30] | "Design document structure" (e-mail message); Richard Brooksby; Ravenbrook Limited; 2000-08-30. |
[RB 2000-10-05] | "P4DTI Project Design Document Procedure"; Richard Brooksby; Ravenbrook Limited; 2000-10-05. |
[Schreiber 2001-04-09] | "TeamTrack API client update" (e-mail message); Royce Schreiber; TeamShare; 2001-04-09. |
[Shaw 2001-04-16] | "Notes on memory usage in the API" (e-mail message); Kelly Shaw; TeamShare; 2001-04-16. |
[Shaw 2001-06-27] | "Re: Advice needed: cases table id and name" (e-mail message); Kelly Shaw; TeamShare; 2001-06-27. |
[Shaw 2001-06-28] | "Re: Advice needed: cases table id and name" (e-mail message); Kelly Shaw; TeamShare; 2001-06-28. |
[Shaw 2001-07-02] | "Re: Nasty API bug" (e-mail message); Kelly Shaw; TeamShare; 2001-07-02. |
[Shaw 2001-10-01] | "Perforce Integration Issue with the Service Pack" (e-mail message); Kelly Shaw; TeamShare; 2001-10-01. |
[Shaw 2001-12-19] | "Migration plan for expiring licenses used to support P4DTI"; Kelly Shaw; TeamShare; 2001-12-19. |
[Shaw 2002-02-05] | "Re: TeamTrack API 3.5 compatibility" (e-mail message); Kelly Shaw; TeamShare; 2002-02-05. |
[TeamShare 2000-01-20] | "TeamTrack Database Schema (Database Version: 21)"; TeamShare; 2000-01-20. |
[TeamShare 2001-04-09] | "ReadRecordListWithWhere.C"; TeamShare; 2001-04-09. |
[TeamShare 2001-05-02] | "TeamTrack API Reference Guide"; TeamShare; 2001-05-02. |
[TeamShare 2001-12-12] | "TeamTrack API (for TeamTrack build 50207)"; TeamShare; 2000-12-12. |
[van Rossum 1999-04-13] | "Extending and Embedding the Python Interpreter (release 1.5.2)"; Guido van Rossum; 1999-04-13. |
2000-08-08 | GDR | Created. |
2000-08-29 | GDR | Moved to master/design/teamtrack/. |
2000-08-30 | GDR | Renamed to master/design/python-teamtrack-interface/. |
2000-09-07 | GDR | Added note about reference counts on values returned
to Python. Changed XHTML identifiers for methods so that I don't have
to renumber them. Split out error identifiers into their own
sections. Added new cross-references. Sorted identifiers in the
teamtrack module by name. Documented add_field method and field_type dictionary. |
2000-09-15 | GDR | Documented transition and submit methods. |
2000-10-05 | RB | Updated reference to design document procedure [RB 2000-10-05] to point to on-line document. |
2001-03-02 | RB | Transferred copyright to Perforce under their license. |
2001-06-26 | GDR | Added methods case_table_id and case_table_name . |
2001-06-28 | GDR | Added reference to Kelly Shaw's advice for computing the case_table_id and case_table_name methods. |
2001-07-03 | GDR | Renumbered sections. Added section on TeamTrack server versions. Explained how we support TeamTrack 4.5 and 5.0. |
2002-01-10 | GDR | New dictionary feature indicates which
features are supported. Method submit no longer takes a type
argument and returns the record id, not the issue id. It defined iff
the submit feature is supported. |
2002-02-01 | GDR | Set out table of compatibility between TeamTrack API revisions and server version. |
2002-03-14 | NB | Removed support for TeamTrack 5.02. |
2003-06-02 | NB | Marked as obsolete. |
This document is copyright © 2001 Perforce Software, Inc. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use of this document in any form, with or without modification, is permitted provided that redistributions of this document retain the above copyright notice, this condition and the following disclaimer.
This document is provided by the copyright holders and contributors "as is" and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. In no event shall the copyright holders and contributors be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data, or profits; or business interruption) however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability, or tort (including negligence or otherwise) arising in any way out of the use of this document, even if advised of the possibility of such damage.
$Id: //info.ravenbrook.com/project/p4dti/version/2.4/design/python-teamtrack-interface/index.html#2 $
Ravenbrook / Projects / Perforce Defect Tracking Integration / Version 2.4 Product Sources / Design